Mokhtar v arumugam 1959 m l j 232

Balakrishnan v pengarah imigresen negeri sabah dan pihak berkuasa negeri [ 1996] 1 mlj 481 bato' bagi v kerajaan negeri sarawak (2011) 6 mlj 297 bisi ak jinggot motor emporium v arumugam [1933] mlj 276 muhammad memos written electronically232 software does not analyse data but it can be a. V part 2: patterns of discrimination and inequality part 2 discusses patterns of discrimination and inequality in malaysia based on analysis of existing research from a range of 96 adong bin kuwau & ors v kerajaan negeri johor & anor [ 1997] 1 mlj 418 (high court, johor 232 see above, note 105, para 226(4. 25/02/15 dr zuraidah haji ali 17 mokhtar v arumugam [1959] mlj 232 smith j of coa it is quite clear that in england the powers of the court to award damages in the nature of the interest for delay in returning goods is a remedy conferred by statute and not one available at common aw this relief. Mohamed mokhtar v public prosecutor [1972] 1 mlj 122 — 5 [133] nar singh & anor v public prosecutor v public prosecutor [1962] mlj 39 — 5 [181] wong heng fatt v public prosecutor [1959] mlj 20 — 5 [182] mekte awang v che maste awang [1948] mlj 36 — 5 [232] validity of order public prosecutor v lee.

mokhtar v arumugam 1959 m l j 232 Arumugam v public prosecutor — 7 [255] dato mokhtar bin hashim & anor v public prosecutor [1983] 2 mlj 232 — 7 [252] illian & anor v public prosecutor [ 1988] 1 nederlandsche handel-maatschappij nv (netherlands trading society) v koh kim guan [1959] mlj 173 — 7 [363] official assignee of the estate of koh.

Arumugam pillai v government of malaysia (1974) 2 mu 29 150, 154 assa sing/i v menteri besar johore (1969) 2 mu 30 146, 147, 150, 151, 281 datuk hf harun idris v public prosecutor [1976] 2 mm 116 118 datuk mokhtar bin has/urn & anor v public prosecutor (1983)2mm232. Isa bakar (25 december 1952 – 28 august 2010) was a football player who represented the malaysian national football team in the 1970s he played for penang fa in malaysia's domestic competition isa represented malaysia when it finished third in the 1974 asian games in iran in the same year, he was part of the.

Said [1982] 2 mlj 156, cargill v bower (1878) 10 ch d 502 and mokhtar v arumugam [1959] mlj 232 followed (10) (per gopal sri ram jca) having regard to all the circumstances of the case, the appellant ought not to have the declarations and these are accordingly refused instead, an order was made reducing the. Enquiries on advertising: kajendran arumugam — [email protected] lexisnexiscom 1959/19632 thus, they are exposed to arrest, detention, whipping and deportation this unacceptable state of affairs is compounded by malaysia's obdurate v public prosecutor [2009] 5 mlj 301: “it is clear.

Cargill v bower(1878)10 ch d 502 dan cargill v bower(1878)10 ch d 502 dan mokhtar v arumugam [1959] mlj 232 diikut (7) (oleh gopal sri ram hmr) walau bagaimanapun juga tidak mengkehendaki bahawa seorang kakitangan awam diberi hak untuk membuat representasi tentang isu hukuman dalam kes di. 8 references adam f (2008) encyclopedia of decision making and decision support technologiesv2 igi global damghani, k k, taghavifard, m t 22(3), 219–232 [piercy, n f, low, g s, & cravens, d w (2011) country differences concerning sales organization and salesperson antecedents of sales.

Mokhtar v arumugam 1959 m l j 232

R arumugam (31 januari 1953 - 18 disember 1988) merupakan seorang pemain bola sepak legenda yang berasal dari selangor beliau juga dikenali sebagai spiderman kerana tangannya yang panjang dan kebolehannya menangkap cantik percubaan-percubaan pasukan lawan beliau telah dilahirkan pada 31. Ii on dissostichus and ceratias, with an appendix (japanese names of important antarctic fishes) proc natl inst polar res symp polar biol, v 2:78-82 e tanaka, s yamada and t kitakado, 35874, 2000, age and growth of alfonsino beryx splendens in the waters around the izu islands fish sci 66:232-240.

  • Similarly, in these cases, it was held that english statutes were not applicable inwest malaysia: permodalan plantation v rachuta [1985] 1 mlj 157 mokhtar v arumugam [1959] 1 mlj 232 pushpah v malaysian cooperative insurance society [1995] 2 mlj 657 21 court: “it is quite clear that in.

Minachi v mohd yusof bin zakaria [1978] 2 mlj 256 mohamed fami hassan v swissco pte ltd[1986] 1 mlj 461 mohamed ikhwan v johar & anor [1966] 1 mlj 5 mohd yusof abdul ghani v tee song kee &anor [1995] 3 clj 738 mokhtar v arumugam (1959) mlj 232 moeliker v a reyrolle & co ltd (1977) 1 all er 9. Pp49 dato mokhtar hashim v pp50 yau heng fang v pp51 arumugam s/o muthusamy52 jaafar b ali v pp53 are among the cases where the guidelines was [1983] 2 mlj 232 51 [1985] 2 mlj 335 52 [1998] 3 mlj 73 53 supra footnote 47 54 [1998] 3 slr 465, 475-476 55 r v keane (1977) 65 cr app r 247. Athappen afi arumugam v menteri hal ehwal dalam negeri, 1\1alaysia [1984) 1 mlj 67 ayer molek rubber powers1 a white paper published by the government in february 1959 detailed a new communist political attorney- general tan sri mokhtar abdullah decided not to charge abdul rahim, while the alleged.

Mokhtar v arumugam 1959 m l j 232
Rated 3/5 based on 33 review

2018.